SLIDESHOW EXPLANATION

THE PHOTOS SCROLLING BY IN THE SLIDESHOW ON THE LEFT ARE ORIGINAL AND CAN BE VIEWED OR PURCHASED AT WWW.WIZARDPIXPHOTOGRAPHY.COM

Thursday, July 25, 2013

SENATORS PROPOSE 50 YEARS OF GUARANTEED SECRECY FOR COLLEAGUES' TAX CODE SUGGESTIONS (because nothing gets done if the public is watching...)


          Is this what it's come to in the Congress?  Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont) and his Republican counterpart, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) have promised their committee colleagues that their tax code suggestions will be kept under lock and key for the next fifty years, allowing them to offer policy without being under the watchful eyes of the voting public.  They're hoping to get more input from the rest of the boys club if they promise to hide the identities of those making the policy suggestions.

          Hoo-boy...

          When I first read this bit of news (thanks to The Political Carnival for the heads up) I was certain we had entered the realm of an old situation comedy from my childhood.  Maxwell Smart and his boss would sometimes crouch under the infamous "Cone of Silence " on "Get Smart" in order to discuss spy operations in total privacy, usually with disastrous results.  They'd end up screaming at one another to be heard, and the Plexiglass dome over their heads would often malfunction and drop down upon them... 


 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

            Letting Senators hide their ideas from the prying eyes of the public sounds like a recipe for a lobbyist dream team.  Put a few dollars in the right Senator's reelection coffers, send him a list of demands for the new tax code, and know in your heart of hearts that Senator's suggestions won't see the light of day until 2064?  Game on!

            But then I thought about it for a few minutes, and now I'm beginning to think this might be the only way we can get folks in Congress to do the country's work.  Think about the current situation:  no one on the right can make a moderate suggestion toward compromise with the Democratic Party without risking a Tea Party primary fight in their home district.  Even when they KNOW the legislation before them would be good for the country, they often have to vote along strict party lines to keep the baying hounds of their base away from their asses.

           And Democrats in Congress often look at progressive legislation with a dim view, but support the cause simply to keep the peace among liberals in their own base.

            So nothing substantial gets done.

            If Congressmen could go into a Cone of Silence for real negotiations on immigration reform, health care reform, tax code reform, and make suggestions toward compromise without the fear of being pilloried at home, perhaps this dysfunctional mess in Washington could actually begin to make progress.

            Of course, if the Koch brothers thought they could get everything they've ever wanted out of Congress simply by dumping a few billion more into the process, who's to say they wouldn't wield even more power than they already do?

            Maybe an anonymous Congress would do a better job?

            One large caveat to that notion:  the final votes on all of their wranglings would have to be VERY public.

             We'd at least get to see who votes for the things they create in their secret lab... 

7 comments:

Infidel753 said...

That's exactly it. The Republicans have seen enough of their colleagues get primaried by nutbars to be running seriously scared. Maybe they hope they can get away with voting for the finished product if they can claim all the teabag-incompatible ideas were originated by Democrats, but if so, it's wishful thinking. Most likely they just aren't looking that far ahead.

notacynic said...

Get rid of the gerrymander first. Then we'll see if maybe the light of day isn't the right perscription.

Leslie Parsley said...

OT: Your comment on Juanita Jean's post re Gohmert is going viral on FB. It's a beaut.

squatlo said...

Thanks for the heads up... I just signed back up for FB, after two or three years without that abuse, and I'm ONLY using it to promote my photography. No politics. But damn it's hard to ignore the asshats over there!

Anonymous said...

Leslie (or OT) I don't suppose you could link to the Juanita Jean article you are referencing? I avoid FB like it was a social media site.

squatlo said...

Anonymous, here's the Juanita Jean story on Louie Louie:

http://juanitajean.com/2013/07/25/your-daily-louie/

Anonymous said...

Many thanks!

And I forgot to mention, great article, and something I had pondered as well.